Showing posts with label Scott Elbert. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Scott Elbert. Show all posts

Wednesday, September 14, 2011

The Dodgers should not spend big on the bullpen next year






Ned Colletti was recently quoted in an interview as saying "I don't think we're that far away" re: the 2012 Dodgers roster.  Strange as this statement may be, we thought we would take a look around at various parts of the team to add our ridiculously insightful opinions on what exactly he may mean, arbitrarily starting with the bullpen. 

When this season started, Jonathan Broxton, Vicente Padilla, and Hong-Chi Kuo were expected to be the bedrocks of the bullpen, a trio of “proven veteran leaders” (see what we did there?) that would dominate the last two to three innings of a game.  That plan worked out flawlessly.

Look, there is no getting around the fact that Broxton was a disappointment this year- though probably not because he lacked the balls to pitch. No matter how much people may say Broxton lacked the heart or guts or other cliches to close, his absence since May 5th shows that his ineffectiveness was due to SOMETHING being wrong with him physically.  Still, he brought no value to the Dodgers this year and will certainly be gone next season.  You can add Vicente Padilla to that list as well, for mostly the same reasons.  We wish them both a healthy recovery and a chance from another team- hopefully one in the American League, so they can’t shut us out 15 times next season as a Giant.  We’ll get to Kuo shortly.  

 
Before we get to the Kuo question, though, let’s look at the good that came from the early season bullpen implosion::  the Dodgers brought up four young pitchers who have quietly (too quietly) been very good this year.  Javy Guerra, Kenley Jansen, Scott Elbert and Josh Lindblom have all stepped up and provided Mattingly with some impressive weapons out of the bullpen.  Guerra got the flashy job- saves are overrated, but 18 of them in 19 attempts is pretty darn good. But what really jumps out to us is the fact that he's only given up one homerun in 169 plate appearances against him while holding opponents to a .602 OPS.  His strikeouts could stand to come up a little, but they're not terrible either.  We already did an entire post on Kenley Jansen so we won't rehash just how great he is here, but needless to say he's still awesome and in fact gotten even better since our post. He and Guerra should be handling the closing duties from here on out in one fashion or another.  Scott Elbert has long been an interesting case- the talent has never been questioned, but he's just never seemed to be able to put it all together,  in particular, his control has always been an issue.  This year, though he’s been used sparingly, it seems like he’s finally figured it out.  His ERA sits at 2.64 in just over thirty innings with 30 strikeouts and, here's the part that has us optimistic about his future, just 11 walks.  Josh Lindblom hasn't been quite as good as the previous three, at least in terms of his strikeout to walk numbers.  His ERA is a shiny 2.88 and he's holding opponents to just a .591 OPS so he's clearly doing something right, but in 25 innings pitched he's struck out 18 and walked 9 (though 3 of them were intentional).  These might not be dazzling stats, but they're good enough to go to battle with him next year.


That leaves us with four locks for the bullpen next year, all (here’s the great part) making the league minimum.  Matt Guerrier and his $3.75MM salary can be added to that list as well-  overpaid he might be, but he's still a veteran, rubber arm type of guy that can eat up middle innings and pitch back to back nights.  Plus, there’s no way anyone else would take him off our hands at that salary, so there you go.
 
So we have one to two spots open in the bullpen next year, depending on whether they go with an 11 or 12 man pitching staff out of the gate.  The current candidates include Hong-Chih Kuo, who has had all kinds of problems this year and stands to make a hefty chunk of change in arbitration next season, Blake Hawksworth, Mike MacDougal, Ramon Troncoso and John Ely.  It's hard to tell which direction the Dodgers will go, but I suspect they won't be willing to pay Hong-Chih Kuo too much, and will continue to have zero faith (for good reason) in Ramon Troncoso.  John Ely doesn't really seem suited to pitching out of the pen, but he has a shot to make the squad as a mop-up/swingman type.  We honestly wouldn't be surprised if Hawksworth and MacDougal are both brought back, and that's not necessarily a bad thing.  Those two probably would not be pitching the highest leverage innings and neither one has been too bad this year either.  



The bottom line is this: the Dodgers are in desperate need of offense and have little money to upgrade.  Let's put aside our hopes of Fielder or Pujols- that just isn’t going to happen- but they're going to have to do something.  Having a bullpen this good, and this cheap, is crucial to providing the payroll flexibility needed to sign a bat or two.  

Saturday, August 6, 2011

Things we learned from tonight's game (8/6/11)

I love that Steve Lyons continues to ask him questions.  Hard hitting  coverage from Psycho, here.
Overview:  Captain EO gains a nickname and fans seven in his MLB debut, but Dee Gordon leaves with a shoulder injury.  Dodgers win, 5-3.

Pros:  Nathan Eovaldi starts his major league career off in pretty good fashion, going five innings with seven strikeouts.  He also went one for two at the plate, hitting a single and later scoring a run to help his own cause.  Captain EO (hat tip to twitter's own Chad Moriyama and Robert Huitron for that gem) threw 77 pitches and still looked fresh, but was pulled for a pinch hitter in the top of the sixth.  Andre Ethier got his average back over .300 with a two hit game, and he, Rivera, Miles and Barajas (3 for 4?!?) chipped in RBIs.  On the pitching side, Blake Hawksworth threw two perfect innings and Scott Elbert danced around some shaky defense in the ninth to record his second save of the season.

Cons: DEE GORDON GOT HURT.  Thankfully, it doesn't sound like it's a serious injury, as Gordon wasn't wearing a sling and was back in the dugout laughing with the team after a few innings.  But the Dodgers need to see Gordon play every day for the rest of the season, and a lingering shoulder injury would be disastrous for long term planning's sake.  If Ned doesn't trust Gordon by the end of the season, there's a high chance he could do something stupid (Tejada and O. Cab are free agents) or really stupid (Jimmy Rollins for six years and 100 million?) in the offseason.  Also, Matt Guerrier continues to not be very good- starting to get a little more concerned about that three year deal.  

What we learned:  That Nathan Eovaldi will be the starting pitcher five days from now, and five days after that.  It's one start, so Eovaldi mania should be tempered, but it was certainly an encouraging start.  We're looking forward to seeing more.  A quick word of caution to him, though- don't expect five runs of support every time, Nate.

Thursday, July 28, 2011

Things we learned from last night's game (7/27)




Overview:  Still no run support for Mr. Kuroda.  Rockies 3 Dodgers 1.

Pros:  For the 142nd time this season,Hiroki Kuroda tossed a quality start, going six innings, allowing one run while striking out 6 and walking 3.  That he still got the loss is hardly a surprise anymore.  Other positives from last night?  Well, Kemp had two hits, including a double.  Furcal had two hits as well and actually seems to be heating up (.808 OPS over his last eight games), though he did get caught stealing as well.  The Dodgers, had 8 hits total and still managed just one run on a solo homerun by Rod Barajas in the 9th (what contender needs a catcher with some pop?).  Also, Scott Elbert pitched 2/3 of an inning and struck out one and allowed no runs.  Not really all  that exciting but we're grasping at straws here.

Cons:  The Dodgers were 0-4 with runners in scoring position, once again showing their remarkable ineptitude at driving in runs.  Hawksworth and Macdougal each gave up a run in their innings of  relief (Macdougal actually pitched 1 and 1/3).  Ethier went hitless which should not come as a surprise at this point.  He's been pretty awful in July, posting just a .664 OPS.  Really, there are so many cons here that it gets tiresome to list them.  On the bright side, the four game winning streak is over so hopefully that means nobody at all is convinced that the Dodgers can go on a run.

What we learned:  That once again, if your first or last name starts with a K, you're probably one of the bright spots of the 2011 Los Angeles Dodgers.  

Sunday, July 17, 2011

Things we learned from last night's game (7/16/11)

Hiroki Kuroda daydreams about what it would be like to have an offense
Photo credit: Getty Images

Overview: Kuroda solid, Kemp great, rest of team can't get it together. 3-2, Diamondbacks win.

Pros: Hiroki Kuroda overcame a rough couple of innings in the early going (even the outs the D'backs were hitting were hard in the first two innings) to put together another wasted quality start.  Tony Gwynn Jr. got on base three times in four at-bats, and continues to look pretty comfortable as the de facto leadoff hitter.  Scott Elbert came in and pitched two very strong scoreless innings.  Matt Kemp hits the baseball harder than anyone else on the planet.

Cons: Wow, the offense other than Kemp is awful.  Ethier is in a funk right now, hitting .167 in his last 10 games.  Furcal is 3 for 34 since coming off the DL (hat tip to @Joe_Block, who tweeted us in-game with that info).  Uribe was 0 for 3 before being pinch hit for in the 9th by James Loney.  Juan Rivera was 0 for 4, but that's not too surprising considering he was playing against an RHP.

What we learned: Same old story- if the other team can limit the damage Matt Kemp causes, they've got a good chance to win.  Furcal reduces whatever lingering trade value he has with every start, and Kuroda's record this season (now 6-11) has pretty much nothing to do with his ability.  This was a very winnable game that the Dodgers couldn't convert, and the kind of game that illustrates why the team needs to go back to the drawing board.